Is there still Rule of Law in Gibraltar? Is there corruption in the local police?
Are employees' Human Rights protected? Is there a mafia in Gibraltar?
How corrupt are the Courts in Gibraltar? Is Entain a bad employer?
- Home page
- My witness statement for the courts
- Evidence supporting my witness statement
- Failure of the first Tribunal Chairman
- Sabotage of the Tribunal transcript
- The evidence in the Tribunal transcript
- Press articles about Tribunal failings
- Corruption articles in the international press
- Entain / GVC
- Hassans law firm
- The Disciplinary Committee and LSRA
- Gibraltar Police
Throughout the hearing, and as well reflected in the ensuing Judgement, the Chairman made a few statements and observations which sounded very strange and unreal to me.
Page 1560 A – 1561 F: referring to a UK Judgement, I bring up that there is a cumulative effect of bullying incidents, the Chairman agrees with this but then says, which is a contradiction, that it is not about bullying campaigns but about incidents.
Page 1984 A – G: I point out that there was no correct grievance procedure but the Chairman states that this is not relevant.
Page 1988 E – 1989 F: the Chairman makes unreasonable suggestions, claiming “he's throwing things in the air” in what was apparently an attempt to catch me out on something. I was completely shocked as the Chairman jumped up from his chair, used a loud voice and waived his arms in the air to create the impression that he was very angry with me. I pointed out that I suffered from loss of self-confidence and self-esteem because of the bullying at work and that his approach was not helpful for this. In page 2058 A – D: at the end of being cross-examined, the Chairman comes back to his style of questioning by “throwing things in the air”, he seemed to be embarrassed by this kind of questioning. The Chairman never did this with any other witness during the ten days of hearing. In page 2096 B – C: During Stef van Veen's cross-examination I refer to the Chairman jumping up and waving his arms the morning of the 20th and that I was entirely shocked by it.
Page 2072 G – 2073 D: I wanted to point out to Stef van Veen that Judge Yeats had written in his Judgement about countless complaints about bullying, but the Chairman forbade me to do this.
Page 2277 B – 2279 H: The Chairman comes up with a theory that I have to follow my team leader's instructions to solve a case, even when her instructions are wrong. He refers to a WWI general who gets almost all of his troops killed. I referred to Stef van Veen who stated that Susana was wrong in quality reports but didn't want to admit or correct her mistake. I was flabbergasted by the Chairman's view, which resulted in arguing between the Chairman and me.
Page 2466 A – D: After Mr Martinez re-examined Yousri Amrani, I had a few more questions about the document Mr Amrani had disclosed on the Friday before the ten-day Tribunal hearing started. The Chairman forced it upon me that I could only ask questions about the document, that I had to take it out of its context and put it in a vacuum. This went entirely against the instruction in Judge Yeats' first Appeal Judgement. I was utterly confused by the Chairman's request.
Page 2671 G – 2672 A: The Chairman seems to defend the position that it doesn't matter on a test or an exam if your answers are correct or not, that it is entirely up to the person who is marking what the outcome will be.
"Except with his own consent, no person shall be hindered in the enjoyment of his freedom of expression, that is to say, freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart ideas and information without interference."