Is there still Rule of Law in Gibraltar? Is there corruption in the local police?
Are employees' Human Rights protected? Is there a mafia in Gibraltar?
How corrupt are the Courts in Gibraltar? Is Entain a bad employer?
- Home page
- My witness statement for the courts
- Evidence supporting my witness statement
- Failure of the first Tribunal Chairman
- Sabotage of the Tribunal transcript
- The evidence in the Tribunal transcript
- Press articles about Tribunal failings
- Corruption articles in the international press
- Entain / GVC
- Hassans law firm
- The Disciplinary Committee and LSRA
- Gibraltar Police
Previous page | Witness Statement Bart Van Thienen Page 114 | Next page
|
of the reasons. Thanks and best regards, Bart 192. Stefan Kalcher's reply via email: Hey Bart, It wasn’t only the technical requirements Thanks Stefan 193. I was absolutely flabbergasted by this reply from Stefan Kalcher. This was not a reply at all. He did not explain how I did fail for the technical requirements or what exactly were his reasons for thinking that I did not have the necessary knowledge or the lack of possibility for me to learn what I was missing. This email felt as if Stefan Kalcher was embarrassed with the real reason for not giving me the job and he was trying to fob me off with some general comment that could be interpreted in many different ways. After all, I was only asked to do a test after a successful video interview in which my technical skills and experience were discussed at length. The test itself went well apart from the Excel question but that had been pointed out already during the video interview and had not been a problem at that moment. I decided to send Stefan Kalcher another email asking for a better explanation. 194. My further reply to Stefan Kalcher's email: Thanks Stefan for the reply. I am actually baffled by your statement as I don't know or understand what the meaning of it is, can you please elaborate? Thanks and best regards, Bart 195. The further reply Stefan Kalcher sent me a few days later: |
Previous page | Witness Statement Bart Van Thienen Page 114 | Next page
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206
"Except with his own consent, no person shall be hindered in the enjoyment of his freedom of expression, that is to say, freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart ideas and information without interference."