Is there still Rule of Law in Gibraltar? Is there corruption in the local police?
Are employees' Human Rights protected? Is there a mafia in Gibraltar?
How corrupt are the Courts in Gibraltar? Is Entain a bad employer?
- Home page
- My witness statement for the courts
- Evidence supporting my witness statement
- Failure of the first Tribunal Chairman
- Sabotage of the Tribunal transcript
- The evidence in the Tribunal transcript
- Press articles about Tribunal failings
- Corruption articles in the international press
- Entain / GVC
- Hassans law firm
- The Disciplinary Committee and LSRA
- Gibraltar Police
Previous page | Witness Statement Bart Van Thienen Page 205 | Next page
|
too much and I was not able anymore to deal with any of the rubbish they kept coming up with. I could not deal anymore with any of their fake schemes that would push me deeper in my depression. I had to stop this and try to get my life back on track. The thought of having to go back in the GVC offices almost paralysed me. Even when I went to shop in Morrisons I used the back roads so I would not bump into anyone from their personnel. 326. My reply to Gareth Fieldhouse (CC Cecilia Malmgren): Dear Gareth, These matters are now in the hands of the relevant authorities and tribunals. They will contact you in due course. Regards, Bart 327. That same date 31st May 2018 Gareth Fieldhouse replied to my email. He repeated that he wanted to set a date for both appeals. It added to my despair that that man did not seem to understand that I wanted to be left in peace. That I did not want to hear from him or anyone else in GVC again. 328. The email from Gareth Fieldhouse (CC Cecilia Malmgren): Dear Bart We acknowledge the content of your email. Please note, given you had indicated your desire to appeal both decisions the company would still be happy to arrange the appeal hearings mentioned below at a mutually convenient time. Kind regards Gareth 329. The next day 1st June 2018 I replied to Gareth Fieldhouse (CC to Cecilia Malmgren). I made it very clear that I wished not to repeat earlier communication. Everything that that man wanted to know, was already known by the company. It showed that he was not genuine in his emails and his intention was not to find a solution. I was not able to think |
Previous page | Witness Statement Bart Van Thienen Page 205 | Next page
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206
"Except with his own consent, no person shall be hindered in the enjoyment of his freedom of expression, that is to say, freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart ideas and information without interference."