Is there still Rule of Law in Gibraltar? Is there corruption in the local police?
Are employees' Human Rights protected? Is there a mafia in Gibraltar?
How corrupt are the Courts in Gibraltar? Is Entain a bad employer?
- Home page
- My witness statement for the courts
- Evidence supporting my witness statement
- Failure of the first Tribunal Chairman
- Sabotage of the Tribunal transcript
- The evidence in the Tribunal transcript
- Press articles about Tribunal failings
- Corruption articles in the international press
- Entain / GVC
- Hassans law firm
- The Disciplinary Committee and LSRA
- Gibraltar Police
Previous page | Witness Statement Bart Van Thienen Page 203 | Next page
|
Outcome were intrinsically linked. The company was clearly not genuinely looking for a solution and it was becoming very obvious that they were trying to win time in the hope that the legal three months time limit to start proceedings at the Employment Tribunal under the Bullying at Work Act would lapse. 322. My reply to Cecilia Malmgren: Dear Cecilia, Your e-mails are becoming ever more obtuse and confusing. On several occasions in the recent past I have listed you the documents and information requested. I have also repeatedly stated that my appeal against unfair dismissal and my appeal against the Bullying Investigation Outcome are intrinsically connected. Again: the lack of documentary evidence of my rights within the appeals or your continuing refusals to provide them to me, show that the company is not genuinely looking for a solution and it is becoming obvious that you are trying to win time in the hope that the legal time limits will be gone so I can't use legal action. As I am now convinced that GVC has zero interest in working out an honest solution respecting all my rights, I can confirm that today the forms for the Industrial Tribunal have been filled in. Regards, Bart 323. On 30th May 2018 I received an email from Gareth Fieldhouse, legal counsel for GVC according to the footer of the email. All of a sudden I could now do both appeals; bullying and dismissal. My bullying complaints were still minimised as “allegations” and there was no mention at all about my mental health condition caused by the company's inaction to stop the bullying. The appeal for bullying would be heard prior to the dismissal appeal. They simply continued to make up the rules as they went along. The credibility of the appeal process was further undermined and became an even bigger mockery. The breach of the Data Protection Act was brushed under the carpet and the company set a new deadline: “by close of business on Tuesday 5 June 2018”, although the law was very clear and they were already over the twenty-eight days allowed. No trust or confidence was restored at all, only further postponements and empty promises without any genuine |
Previous page | Witness Statement Bart Van Thienen Page 203 | Next page
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206
"Except with his own consent, no person shall be hindered in the enjoyment of his freedom of expression, that is to say, freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart ideas and information without interference."