Is there still Rule of Law in Gibraltar? Is there corruption in the local police?
Are employees' Human Rights protected? Is there a mafia in Gibraltar?
How corrupt are the Courts in Gibraltar? Is Entain a bad employer?
- Home page
- My witness statement for the courts
- Evidence supporting my witness statement
- Failure of the first Tribunal Chairman
- Sabotage of the Tribunal transcript
- The evidence in the Tribunal transcript
- Press articles about Tribunal failings
- Corruption articles in the international press
- Entain / GVC
- Hassans law firm
- The Disciplinary Committee and LSRA
- Gibraltar Police
Previous page | Witness Statement Bart Van Thienen Page 181 | Next page
|
understand by now, and creating more confusion and insecurity doesn't help me at all. Could you please point out what my present situation is: - I have already already been sacked by the company. - I am supposed to resign myself. - I am to return to work after my appeal has been investigated. In the last case I have clearly pointed out that I want suspension till 8th May, then annual leave till 16th May. This gives both me the necessary time to write an appeal and the company after that time to investigate it properly. That seems quite an honest deal to me. Looking forward to you reply and with kind regards, Bart 289. The same day 4th May 2018 Emma Horwood replied to my email and explained how I had to do the appeal. She went to great lengths to try to downplay what my appeal should be. According to her I should only explain in my appeal why going back to work without any real changes regarding the bullying, would not work. She clearly did not take on board any of the reasons I already brought up earlier or refused to accept those. There was no mention at all about my mental health problems although I had explained those several times over the last few days and weeks. There was also the continued lie about my holiday request not being possible, etc. She wrote that I had been put on leave without pay but further threatened to sack me if I were to stay away from work another day. That I might have a new mental breakdown when going back to the toxic environment, did not seem to worry her at all. She entirely ignored that I wanted to appeal against not only the outcome of the decision, I wanted to appeal the whole of the flawed and manipulated investigation so I wanted to bring up as much material as possible, properly organised in a timeline for a better understanding. 290. Emma Horwood's reply via email (CC Danielle Wood): Morning Bart, Thank you for finally getting in touch, we were concerned about you. Okay it seems you have a number of issues confused, specifically in regards to the appeal. As you know, I have tried to call you the last couple of days to check on your wellbeing and to also clear up these points as it may have been easier on the phone, |
Previous page | Witness Statement Bart Van Thienen Page 181 | Next page
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206
"Except with his own consent, no person shall be hindered in the enjoyment of his freedom of expression, that is to say, freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart ideas and information without interference."