Is there still Rule of Law in Gibraltar? Is there corruption in the local police?
Are employees' Human Rights protected? Is there a mafia in Gibraltar?
How corrupt are the Courts in Gibraltar? Is Entain a bad employer?
- Home page
- My witness statement for the courts
- Evidence supporting my witness statement
- Failure of the first Tribunal Chairman
- Sabotage of the Tribunal transcript
- The evidence in the Tribunal transcript
- Press articles about Tribunal failings
- Corruption articles in the international press
- Entain / GVC
- Hassans law firm
- The Disciplinary Committee and LSRA
- Gibraltar Police
Previous page | Witness Statement Bart Van Thienen Page 198 | Next page
|
my appeal against the Bullying Investigation Outcome and your refusal to act on that appeal. We are now ten days further and I haven't received any further news from you, it looks like you are not taking my dismissal appeal seriously, as you never took my complaints re bullying seriously. I can confirm you that there is no need for a hearing or meeting as my written appeal already contains the most important points. I hereby request documentary evidence of my rights within the appeal for dismissal procedure. I also request any other documentary evidence relevant to my case. Regards, Bart Van Thienen 314. On 22nd May 2018 Cecilia Malmgren replied and sent an invite for a hearing on Friday 25th May 2018, only three days notice. Her email contained several blatant lies. She claimed that I could not be reached as I had been in Belgium but I read, sent and replied to emails from HR while I was on my holiday there and had my mobile phone with me. She also claimed that she was on business travel but that meant that she still had access to her emails and she was not incommunicado either. I immediately noticed the sadistic insult to hold the appeal hearing in the “Recognition Meeting Room”. Her attempt to hide from the chairman of the meeting that the real reason for my dismissal was the bullying was obvious. Cecilia Malmgren's mention that I had the right to be accompanied at the appeal hearing by a work colleague and no other form of representation was permitted, made it tremendously clear that they had no genuine intention to do a proper appeal hearing, just a pro forma hearing to finally get rid of me once and for all. The loss of trust and confidence in HR had never been more complete than after reading that email and letter. 315. Cecilia Malmgren's reply via email: Hi Bart, I was traveling with business last week and returned yesterday (21 May). As you can see from my email below I ask you to acknowledge the receipt of this letter and I knew you were out of the country. I have now prepared the hearing for this Friday- see attached invite letter and attached a copy of your employment contract. |
Previous page | Witness Statement Bart Van Thienen Page 198 | Next page
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206
"Except with his own consent, no person shall be hindered in the enjoyment of his freedom of expression, that is to say, freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart ideas and information without interference."