Is there still Rule of Law in Gibraltar? Is there corruption in the local police?
Are employees' Human Rights protected? Is there a mafia in Gibraltar?
How corrupt are the Courts in Gibraltar? Is Entain a bad employer?
- Home page
- My witness statement for the courts
- Evidence supporting my witness statement
- Failure of the first Tribunal Chairman
- Sabotage of the Tribunal transcript
- The evidence in the Tribunal transcript
- Press articles about Tribunal failings
- Corruption articles in the international press
- Entain / GVC
- Hassans law firm
- The Disciplinary Committee and LSRA
- Gibraltar Police
Previous page | Witness Statement Bart Van Thienen Page 138 | Next page
|
extended to some but not to others. For instance Yousri Amrani (who had left for the VIP team) was invited but Stef van Veen (who had moved to Traders after Yousri Amrani left) was not invited. I was the second last one in the list of invited people. It was immediately clear that the team party or dinner was centered around the Camp Two guys as the party was for Jose Luis Aznar and Yousri Amrani was invited. That of course meant for me that I would not be going. My present mental state would not allow me to enjoy the time, specifically now that HR had finally started some investigation in the bullying problems with those people. 211. On the same date 11th April 2018 Yousri Amrani was the first to reply to the invitation for the “team dinner”. This clearly showed how close he still was with the team which he had left. No wonder as he was still sharing the same workfloor and office with the Dutch/Flemish team. Yousri Amrani definitely was not moved away to a place or position where he could not bully me anymore. A few other people joined in too for the dinner. I was later told that the dinner happened in a bad atmosphere as there were Yousri Amrani and Jose Luis Aznar on one side and Susana Martin and Martijn van der Vechte on the other side and the negative mutual feelings surfaced again. 212. On 13th April 2018 Danielle Wood sent me the corrected minutes of the 9th April 2018 meeting, Emma Horwood had corrected a few points in the minutes that I had requested. I had now taken up four days of my precious annual leave to give Danielle Wood a week to do an investigation and interview the people involved; bullies, witnesses, management, etc. I was heavily disappointed when Danielle Wood told me that she did not interview anyone at all, not even Susana Martin who had been at work all week, during the annual leave I had sacrificed for this investigation. I felt really sad that I had gone the extra mile to try to go back to a job I loved but then again nothing was done to investigate my bullying complaints. Danielle Wood even asked me again to go back to work, go back to Susana Martin and the other bullies, without any solution provided. My complaint was not even actioned upon. My bullying complaint was obviously not taken serious! I was wondering how serious Danielle Wood was taking her Duty of Care? She simply wanted to send me back to a by now well documented toxic work environment that had caused me mental health problems and I had warned them that my mental health problems would most |
Previous page | Witness Statement Bart Van Thienen Page 138 | Next page
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206
"Except with his own consent, no person shall be hindered in the enjoyment of his freedom of expression, that is to say, freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart ideas and information without interference."