Is there still Rule of Law in Gibraltar? Is there corruption in the local police?
Are employees' Human Rights protected? Is there a mafia in Gibraltar?
How corrupt are the Courts in Gibraltar? Is Entain a bad employer?
- Home page
- My witness statement for the courts
- Evidence supporting my witness statement
- Failure of the first Tribunal Chairman
- Sabotage of the Tribunal transcript
- The evidence in the Tribunal transcript
- Press articles about Tribunal failings
- Corruption articles in the international press
- Entain / GVC
- Hassans law firm
- The Disciplinary Committee and LSRA
- Gibraltar Police
Previous page | Witness Statement Bart Van Thienen Page 166 | Next page
|
“reasonable requests that should be respected”. Roni Maman wrote that the bullying by the Camp Two guys was nothing more than "some concerns". The conclusion to be drawn from this was that the problem was I. I was apparently seeing or creating problems where there were none. This was another major blow to my self-esteem and self-confidence and made me feel enormously distressed and humiliated. 261. As part of Roni Maman's laughable “solution” some meeting between managers would take place but no date was given for such a meeting. Jose Luis Aznar and Yousri Amrani would be asked to limit their visits to the customer service Dutch/Flemish team area but would continue to share the same office floor, recreation area and tiny kitchen. All relevant managers would be made aware of the expectations. The same managers that had done nothing at all over the past eleven months to stop the bullying. The letter continued with a threat: “Any complaint of inappropriate bahaviour will be addressed and could be subject to disciplinary proceedings”. As Susana Martin had already invented complaints and bad evaluations against me and had been dishonest in representing my work, this clearly was a serious threat giving Susana Martin an even bigger stick to bully me with. Any further complaints from me would be investigated and clearly Susana Martin's version would be accepted, not mine. Roni Maman then pointed out the possibility of an appeal but that “Only issues relating to this specific outcome will be considered as part of the appeal process.” That sounded as an absolutely ridiculous limitation of my appeal possibilites seeing the fact that Roni Maman was not aware of all the bullying, that had become clear in the 24th April 2018 meeting. The letter was signed by Emma Horwood on behalf of Roni Maman. That reinforced my belief that HR was actively helping in the covering up of what had really happened. It felt like that letter had already been written before the meeting with Roni Maman had even started. The message of this letter was very clear; go back to the bullies without any solution or leave the company. I felt tremendously alarmed and seriously intimidated and worried how I should respond to this letter. This letter meant that Susana Martin would get a further confirmation that she could get away with murder. Susana Martin had been made aware that I had filed a complaint about her so she would be looking for revenge, her vindictive attitude was well known. There would be no one overseeing the situation, Samira Mouhayar would continue to cover up for Susana Martin and so would HR. |
Previous page | Witness Statement Bart Van Thienen Page 166 | Next page
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206
"Except with his own consent, no person shall be hindered in the enjoyment of his freedom of expression, that is to say, freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart ideas and information without interference."