Is there still Rule of Law in Gibraltar? Is there corruption in the local police?
Are employees' Human Rights protected? Is there a mafia in Gibraltar?
How corrupt are the Courts in Gibraltar? Is Entain a bad employer?
- Home page
- My witness statement for the courts
- Evidence supporting my witness statement
- Failure of the first Tribunal Chairman
- Sabotage of the Tribunal transcript
- The evidence in the Tribunal transcript
- Press articles about Tribunal failings
- Corruption articles in the international press
- Entain / GVC
- Hassans law firm
- The Disciplinary Committee and LSRA
- Gibraltar Police
Previous page | Witness Statement Bart Van Thienen Page 174 | Next page
|
interpretation. E.g. nowhere do you state that my suspension has ended on some date. In the context that I asked specifically for an extension of suspension for the dates that you explicitly do mention in your e-mail, those dates (27th April, Wednesday 2nd May, Thursday 3rd May, Friday 4th May and Monday 7th May) were exactly the ones I asked suspension for. This leads me to believe that suspension was granted for those days. Apart of this you state "Therefore, we will expect you back on your next shift on the rota." This for me means the day after Monday 7th May you mention, being 8th May. Nowhere do you write a different or earlier date and time on which you expected me back at work. As such this is for me a clear confirmation that my suspension was granted. Your e-mail was written though in such an obscure way that depending on the way you look at it, it can be given contradictory meanings, this must have been done intentionally. What confirms my sincere persuasion that indeed extended suspension had been granted, is that although you now claim I had to be back at work on 27th April at 10h00, only on the 29th April at 16h15 Susana, the team leader against whom I filed a bullying complaint, called me. In the department where I work these are the people (managers, team leaders and shift supervisors) who according to procedure should have called me on 27th April, 28th April and 29th April at the BEGINNING of each shift to ask why I didn't appear or was running late: Mouhayar Samira, Schiena Daniela, Martin Susana, Munden James, Dello Nigro Francesca, Parker Mark, Surget Jean-Philippe, Carusi Antonella, Cook Stephen, Krapf Fabien and Pizzo Daniele. Eleven people in responsible positions DID NOT contact me on three consecutive days, clearly because they had been under instruction that my suspension had been extended. It is shocking that the person who I have a documented complaint against, is the one who calls me on two days, this is obviously a continuation of the bullying and I felt and feel very distressed because of this. As I informed you that I appeal the bullying investigation decisions, that means that that person, Susana, is STILL under investigation and NOT in a position to contact me directly. I already assured you some days ago that I will definitely need every day till 8th May to go through thousands of e-mails for a proper documented appeal. That you now revoked the suspension that I am convinced was granted initially is pure sabotage of my right to appeal and defend myself. This is entirely unacceptable and a clear act of victimisation. Another obvious act of victimisation is the refusal of my annual leave request to go to Belgium for family reasons and because I need to renew my Belgian passport, without a passport I cannot travel. I already mentioned this is a matter of urgency. Annual leave could EASILY be granted as for the dates I asked there is cover by other members of the |
Previous page | Witness Statement Bart Van Thienen Page 174 | Next page
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206
"Except with his own consent, no person shall be hindered in the enjoyment of his freedom of expression, that is to say, freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart ideas and information without interference."